Evaluation of The Impact of Various Primers and Artificial Aging on Peel Bonding Strengths and Pattern of Bond Failure between Room Temperature Vulcanized (RTV) M511 Platinum Silicone Elastomers and Heat Polymerized PMMA

Fahad K Alwthinani¹, Nouf Al Humayyani¹, Abdulrahman H. Alzahrani¹, Abdulmajeed O Alotaibi¹ and Mohamed Y. Abdelfattah^{2, 3,}

¹Assistant Professor of Fixed Prosthodontic, Faculty of Dentistry, Taif University, Taif, KSA

²Assistant professor of prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt

³Assistant professor of Removable Prosthodontic, Faculty of Dentistry, Taif University, Taif, KSA

Cite this paper

Fahad K Alwthinani, Nouf Al Humayyani, Abdulrahman H. Alzahrani, Abdulmajeed O Alotaibi and Mohamed Y. Abdelfattah. Evaluation of The Impact of Various Primers and Artificial Aging on Peel Bonding Strengths and Pattern of Bond Failure between Room Temperature Vulcanized (RTV) M511 Platinum Silicone Elastomers and Heat Polymerized PMMA. International Journal of Dental Sciences and Research. 2022; 10(1):13-19. doi: 10.12691/IJDSR-10-1-4

Abstract

Aim: This laboratory research aimed to assess the impact of artificial aging and 3 dissimilar primers on peel bond strength and bond failure pattern of (RTV) M511 Platinum silicone and heat polymerizing PMMA. Materials and Methods: 80 heat-polymerizing PMMA samples, with dimensions 75mm×10mm×3mm were constructed, then allocated into 4 main groups I,II,III and IV based on the primers (No Primer(control), A-330-G, A 304 , and G611 ) utilized to adhere REF M511 Platinum silicone elastomers to acrylic resin samples. All groups were sectioned into 2 subdivisions; subgroup (a): base line (n = 10) were tested in a testing machine after 24 hours and subgroup (b) (n = 10) were tested subsequently to 360 hours of subjecting them to artificial ageing conditions. The assessments were steered at a crossheading speediness of 10 mm/min till peel and bond failure occurred. Exploration of the test readings was conducted using One-way ANOVA, Tukey’s tests, and Independent t-test. Results: There were important influences of adhesive primers on peel resistance at both baseline and after 36h artificial aging, Peel outcomes vacillated between 0.76 and 4.75 at baseline and between 0.092 and 7.33 N/mm at after aging. At base line, (G611) Primer revealed the top peel value (4.35 N/mm), while after aging, the primer (A330-G) displayed the highest value (7.33 N/mm). Failure pattern was mainly cohesive (71.2%), and adhesive (28.8%), at baseline, while it was mainly adhesive (81.3%), and cohesive (18.7%) after 360h of artificial aging process. Conclusion: Best bond values achieved for peel, was achieved using the primers (G611) at the base line and (A330-G) after aging. Consequently, the most favorable combinations between silicone and primer based on bond strengths values were the combination of REF M511 Platinum silicone elastomers and G611 primer and primer A330-G.at the baseline and after aging respectively.

Keywords

silicone maxillofacial elastomers, peel bond strength, artificial aging

Copyright

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References

[1]	The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms: Ninth Edition. J Prosthet Dent. 2017 May; 117(5S): e1-e105.
[2]	M.Y. Abd El-Fattah, H.M. Rashad, N.A. Kashef, M.A. El Ebiary. Evaluation of two different reinforcing materials used with silicone auricular prostheses, Tanta Dental Journal, Volume 10, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 31-38.
[3]	Sanohkan S, Kukiattrakoon B, Peampring C. Tensile bond strength of facial silicone and acrylic resin using different primers. J Orofac Sci 2017; 9: 48-51.
[4]	Mohamed Usman JA, Ayappan A, Ganapathy D, Nasir NN. Oromaxillary prosthetic rehabilitation of a maxillectomy patient using a magnet retained two-piece hollow bulb definitive obturator, a clinical report. Case Rep Dent. 2013;2013:190180.
[5]	Patel H, C M RK, A A P, Bithu AS, Shah K, Prajapati S. The Effect of Primer on Bond Strength of Silicone Prosthetic Elastomer to Polymethylmethacrylate: An in vitro Study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Mar; 9(3): ZC38-42.
[6]	De Caxias FP, Dos Santos DM, Bannwart LC, de Moraes Melo Neto CL, Goiato MC. Classification, History, and Future Prospects of Maxillofacial Prosthesis. Int J Dent. 2019 Jul 18; 2019: 8657619.
[7]	Kosor BY, Artunç C, Şahan H. Adhesive retention of experimental fiber-reinforced composite, orthodontic acrylic resin, and aliphatic urethane acrylate to silicone elastomer for maxillofacial prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Jul; 114(1): 142-8.
[8]	Chang PP, Hansen NA, Phoenix RD, Schneid TR. The effects of primers and surface bonding characteristics on the adhesion of polyurethane to two commonly used silicone elastomers. J Prosthodont. 2009 Jan; 18(1): 23-31.
[9]	Farooqui R, Aras MA, Chitre V, Rajagopal P. An in vitro study to compare the influence of two different primers on the peel bond strength between a maxillofacial silicone material and an acrylic resin material versus a composite resin material. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2021 Jul-Sep;21(3):287-294.
[10]	Hatamleh MM, Watts DC. Bonding of maxillofacial silicone elastomers to an acrylic substrate. Dent Mater. 2010 Apr; 26(4): 387-95.
[11]	Cruz RLJ, Ross MT, Powell SK, Woodruff MA. Advancements in Soft-Tissue Prosthetics Part B: The Chemistry of Imitating Life. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020 Apr 23;8:147.
[12]	Kumar A, Seenivasan MK, Inbarajan A. A Literature Review on Biofilm Formation on Silicone and Poymethyl Methacrylate Used for Maxillofacial Prostheses. Cureus. 2021 Nov 30;13(11):e20029.
[13]	Hamedirad F, Alikhasi M, Hasanzade M. The Effect of Sandblasting on Bond Strength of Soft Liners to Denture Base Resins: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies. Int J Dent. 2021 Dec 22;2021:5674155.
[14]	Mańka-Malara K, Trzaskowski M, Gawlak D. The Influence of Decontamination Procedures on the Surface of Two Polymeric Liners Used in Prosthodontics. Polymers (Basel). 2021 Dec 11;13(24):4340.
[15]	Zielecka M, Rabajczyk A, Cygańczuk K, Pastuszka Ł, Jurecki L. Silicone Resin-Based Intumescent Paints. Materials (Basel). 2020 Oct 27;13(21):4785.
[16]	Blumer L, Schmidli F, Weiger R, Fischer J. A systematic approach to standardize artificial aging of resin composite cements. Dent Mater. 2015 Jul; 31(7): 855-63.
[17]	ASTM D903 – Standard Test Method for Peel or Stripping Strength of Adhesive Bonds. 1998.
[18]	Çevik P. Evaluation of Shore A hardness of maxillofacial silicones: the effect of dark storage and nanoparticles. Eur Oral Res. 2018 May; 52(2): 99-104.
[19]	Hatamleh MM, Polyzois GL, Nuseir A, Hatamleh K, Alnazzawi A. Mechanical Properties and Simulated Aging of Silicone Maxillofacial Elastomers: Advancements in the Past 45 Years. J Prosthodont. 2016 Jul; 25(5): 418-26.
[20]	Patel H, C M RK, A A P, Bithu AS, Shah K, Prajapati S. The Effect of Primer on Bond Strength of Silicone Prosthetic Elastomer to Polymethylmethacrylate: An in vitro Study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Mar; 9(3): ZC38-42.
[21]	El Mourad AM. Assessment of Bonding Effectiveness of Adhesive Materials to Tooth Structure using Bond Strength Test Methods: A Review of Literature. Open Dent J. 2018 Sep 28; 12: 664-678.
[22]	Kreve S, Dos Reis AC. Denture Liners: A Systematic Review Relative to Adhesion and Mechanical Properties. Scientific World Journal. 2019 Mar 3; 2019: 6913080.
[23]	Choi JE, Ng TE, Leong CKY, Kim H, Li P, Waddell JN. Adhesive evaluation of three types of resilient denture liners bonded to heat-polymerized, autopolymerized, or CAD-CAM acrylic resin denture bases. J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Nov; 120(5): 699-705.
[24]	Hatamleh MM, Polyzois GL, Silikas N, Watts DC. Effect of extraoral aging conditions on mechanical properties of maxillofacial silicone elastomer. J Prosthodont. 2011 Aug; 20(6): 439-46.
[25]	Marrega Malavazi E, Dos Santos DM, de Moraes Melo Neto CL, Pereira de Caxias F, Freitas da Silva EV, Bannwart LC, Pesqueira AA, de Melo Moreno AL, de Magalhães Bertoz AP, Goiato MC. Influence of Different Pigmentations and Accelerated Aging on the Hardness and Tear Strength of the A-2186 and MDX4-4210 Silicones. Int J Dent. 2020 Aug 20;2020:8492091.
[26]	Chalian VA, Phillips RW. Materials in maxillofacial prosthetics. J Biomed Mater Res. 1974; 8(4 Pt 2): 349-63.